A thought-provoking piece from Steven Pinker in the New York Times:
NEW forms of media have always caused moral panics: the printing press, newspapers, paperbacks and television were all once denounced as threats to their consumers’ brainpower and moral fiber.
So too with electronic technologies. PowerPoint, we’re told, is reducing discourse to bullet points. Search engines lower our intelligence, encouraging us to skim on the surface of knowledge rather than dive to its depths. Twitter is shrinking our attention spans.
But such panics often fail basic reality checks. When comic books were accused of turning juveniles into delinquents in the 1950s, crime was falling to record lows, just as the denunciations of video games in the 1990s coincided with the great American crime decline. The decades of television, transistor radios and rock videos were also decades in which I.Q. scores rose continuously.
You can read the full piece here.
Keep up with the latest news and analysis
about the Liberal Democrats with my
free monthly email newsletter.
I scour hundreds of blogs and dozens of media outlets for the best news and analysis - so you don't have to. It's completely free and you can leave the list at any time. So why not give it a try today?
You might also be interested in...
- Is the internet really changing politics?
- How the internet is changing British politics – and what 2010 will bring
- How did the internet shape the general election?
- I think Carter-Ruck might be changing this quote, don't you?
- Attempt to set world record for most enthusiastic backer of election candidate narrowly fails

RT @markpack: New post: Is the internet changing how we think? http://bit.ly/9BRviV
[...] to Mark Pack for his direct to a piece by Steven Pinker in the New York Times: …the constant arrival of [...]