Is it simply a question of politicians and pundits always trying to ban technologies they don’t use?

12 August 2011 + 3

In amongst the many causes and contributing factors to this week’s riots, technology certainly takes its place. My Engine colleague Jon Akwue has accurately pointed out how it was Blackberry Messenger far more than the headline-favourite son Twitter which was involved, and the use of technology was by no means all for the bad – witness the Twitter-organised cleanup operations for example.

Yet from some commentators and MPs there were immediate demands to suspend, curtail or otherwise regulate social networks. This was echoed today by David Cameron who promised that the government will look into this very question.

However, the number of communication technologies in the firing line is far short of the number involved in the events. Rolling TV coverage gave the events wall-to-wall coverage. National newspapers took the story to mass audiences well beyond the reach of a news channel. Numerous rioters were spotted talking into their mobile phones.

Calls in response the riots to change the rules over newspapers, TV or voice phone calls have not been made. It is only the new technologies that face those demands.

Or is it simply a question of politicians and pundits always trying to ban technologies they don’t use?

Cross-posted from the MHP Communications blog.

Comment via Facebook

Other references (3)

  1. New from me: Is it simply a question of politicians and pundits always trying to ban technologies they don’t use? http://bit.ly/qnBUU1

  2. [del.icio.us] Is it simply a question of politicians and pundits always trying to ban technologies they don’t us… http://bit.ly/nqmOhX

  3. Till Sommer says:

    New from me: Is it simply a question of politicians and pundits always trying to ban technologies they don’t use? http://bit.ly/qnBUU1

C-