I’m not an expert in this area, so there’s one thing that really puzzles me about the Guardian’s splash about the “secretive” process by which the Prince of Wales is asked to approve certain legislation: it doesn’t seem to me to be anything new. Obscure perhaps, but not new. Which is why I took a look at Hansard and found this - that looks to me like regular reporting in public of the occasions when the Prince of Wales or the Queen has been formally consulted over legislation because it might affect their private interests (the mechanism involved).
So is this really such a splash story or more a revelation about how little journalists (or pretty much anyone else, come to that) look at what is said in Parliament? Not such much a case of a clever use of Freedom of Information requests to unearth a secret as a case of missing what was there in plain view?
Keep up with the latest news and analysis
about the Liberal Democrats with my
free monthly email newsletter.
I scour hundreds of blogs and dozens of media outlets for the best news and analysis - so you don't have to. It's completely free and you can leave the list at any time. So why not give it a try today?
You might also be interested in...

New from me: Secret Royal influence or journalists not reading Hansard? – http://t.co/lTX7e1q7