Is this something to be proud of? Wouldn't it be preferable to raise money from contributions from a larger group source (i.e. a union), rather than be reliant on a number of large donations from individuals (whose aim, implicitly or explicitly stated, is to make their voice louder in the halls of Westminster)?
As Neil touches on Glenn, it seems a bit strange to suggest that donations from individuals are tainted because individuals might be wanting to back a particular view and yet praise bulk trade union donations, when trade unions quite explicitly talk about wanting things in return for their money.
According to the 
