<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Telegraph has a little legal problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markpack.org.uk/baby-p-daily-telegraph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/baby-p-daily-telegraph/</link>
	<description>Mark&#039;s blog about politics, technology and history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:21:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pack: Legal question raised (and published) on Telegraph story &#124; DAILYMAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/baby-p-daily-telegraph/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack: Legal question raised (and published) on Telegraph story &#124; DAILYMAIL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpack.org.uk/?p=1727#comment-456</guid>
		<description>[...] An eagle-eyed spot from Mark Pack, head of innovations for the Liberal Democrats. It looks like the Telegraph team were sharing the editorial process a bit too much here. Probably the capitalised question to the newspaper&#8217;s legal team isn&#8217;t one that should have made it onto a Baby P story on the Telegraph&#8217;s site&#8230; Full story at this link.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An eagle-eyed spot from Mark Pack, head of innovations for the Liberal Democrats. It looks like the Telegraph team were sharing the editorial process a bit too much here. Probably the capitalised question to the newspaper&#8217;s legal team isn&#8217;t one that should have made it onto a Baby P story on the Telegraph&#8217;s site&#8230; Full story at this link.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pack: Legal question raised (and published) on Telegraph story &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/baby-p-daily-telegraph/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack: Legal question raised (and published) on Telegraph story &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpack.org.uk/?p=1727#comment-404</guid>
		<description>[...] An eagle-eyed spot from Mark Pack, head of innovations for the Liberal Democrats. It looks like the Telegraph team were sharing the editorial process a bit too much here. Probably the capitalised question to the newspaper&#8217;s legal team isn&#8217;t one that should have made it onto a Baby P story on the Telegraph&#8217;s site&#8230; Full story at this link.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An eagle-eyed spot from Mark Pack, head of innovations for the Liberal Democrats. It looks like the Telegraph team were sharing the editorial process a bit too much here. Probably the capitalised question to the newspaper&#8217;s legal team isn&#8217;t one that should have made it onto a Baby P story on the Telegraph&#8217;s site&#8230; Full story at this link.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debate around the web &#171; Press Review Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/baby-p-daily-telegraph/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Debate around the web &#171; Press Review Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpack.org.uk/?p=1727#comment-403</guid>
		<description>[...] around the&#160;web In links on May 28, 2009 at 11:03 am  Mark Pack has noticed a Telegraph report on Baby Peter with a small note for the legal team which was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around the&nbsp;web In links on May 28, 2009 at 11:03 am  Mark Pack has noticed a Telegraph report on Baby Peter with a small note for the legal team which was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
