<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Pack &#187; g20</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markpack.org.uk/tag/g20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:55:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Smellie verdict shows shocking lack of accountability in British policing</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/9448/smellie-verdict-shows-shocking-lack-of-accountability-in-british-policing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markpack.org.uk/9448/smellie-verdict-shows-shocking-lack-of-accountability-in-british-policing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lib Dem Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent police complaints commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the headline on this interesting piece over on the Our Kingdom site:
In the aftermath of the G20 protests many predicted that no sort of justice could be expected from either the Independent Police Complaints commission (IPCC), the courts or the Met when it comes to holding the police force to account.  The recent ruling that Sergeat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the headline on this interesting piece over on the Our Kingdom site:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the aftermath of the G20 protests many predicted that no sort of justice could be expected from either the Independent Police Complaints commission (IPCC), the courts or the Met when it comes to holding the police force to account.  The <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2010/apr/01/delroy-smellie-g20-assault">recent ruling</a> that Sergeat Delroy Smellie is not guilty of assault for his <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/guy-aitchison/is-this-assault">attack on Nicola Fisher</a> is yet another indication that there is no accountability within British policing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/andy-may/smellie-verdict-shows-shocking-lack-of-accountability-in-british-policing">read the full piece here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markpack.org.uk/9448/smellie-verdict-shows-shocking-lack-of-accountability-in-british-policing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily View 2×2: 6 September 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/4156/daily-view-2%c3%972-6-september-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markpack.org.uk/4156/daily-view-2%c3%972-6-september-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 06:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lib Dem Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack straw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockerbie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=16067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Sunday edition of The Voice&#8217;s Daily View. And as it&#8217;s a Sunday, it&#8217;s also time for a multimedia chocolate extra. But first&#8230;
Big Stories
 Straw admits Lockerbie trade link
Trade and oil played a part in the decision to include the Lockerbie bomber in a prisoner transfer deal, Jack Straw has admitted.
Speaking to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Sunday edition of The Voice&#8217;s Daily View. And as it&#8217;s a Sunday, it&#8217;s also time for a multimedia chocolate extra. But first&#8230;</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 1.17em;">Big Stories</h3>
<p><strong> Straw admits Lockerbie trade link </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Trade and oil played a part in the decision to include the Lockerbie bomber in a prisoner transfer deal, Jack Straw has admitted.</p>
<p>Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, the UK justice secretary said trade was &#8220;a very big part&#8221; of the 2007 talks that led to the prisoner deal with Libya.</p>
<p>However, Mr Straw&#8217;s spokesman accused the press of &#8220;outrageous&#8221; innuendo. (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8239572.stm">BBC</a>)</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>G20 papers over cracks on bank capital, pay</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The G20 made progress on Saturday in toughening up financial rules but vague compromises over bank capital and pay curbs indicate that fundamental issues remain unresolved.</p>
<p>The crash of Lehman Bros that brought the world&#8217;s financial system to its knees last September was uppermost in minds at the April G20 meeting, which adopted pledges to make it harder for banks to mess up economies in future.</p>
<p>Translating pledges into concrete action is proving to be more painstaking as vested national interests emerge and economic recovery takes the heat out of pressures to reform.</p>
<p>Still, the mood music at Saturday&#8217;s meeting contrasted with the tense summit five months ago when fear stalked the corridors of governments and banks were on tenterhooks as to their fate.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Economy/idUSTRE5842JN20090905">Reuters</a>)</p>
</blockquote>
<h3 style="font-size: 1.17em;">2 Must-Read Blog Posts</h3>
<ul>
<li>Paul Walter explains <a href="http://www.liberalburblings.com/2009/09/most-important-thing-ill-ever-write.html">the most important thing he&#8217;ll ever write</a>.</li>
<li>Stephen Glenn writes about <a href="http://linlithgow-libdems.blogspot.com/2009/09/men-have-eating-disorders-to.html">men with eating disorders</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>(Both of these posts have been selected from those which appeared on Lib Dem Blogs on Saturday. To read more from other Liberal Democrat blogs, take a look at the <a href="http://www.libdemblogs.co.uk">Lib Dem Blogs website</a> and to see what Lib Dems have been saying on Twitter, take a look at <a href="http://www.libdemblogs.co.uk/tweets/">Liberal Tweets</a>.)</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 1.17em;">Sunday Bonus</h3>
<p>Men eating chocolate. It&#8217;s what YouTube was invented for.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:560px; height:340px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pq7JRZso4RM"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pq7JRZso4RM" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markpack.org.uk/4156/daily-view-2%c3%972-6-september-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ian Tomlinson’s death and the CCTV puzzler</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/1394/ian-tomlinson%e2%80%99s-death-and-the-cctv-puzzler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markpack.org.uk/1394/ian-tomlinson%e2%80%99s-death-and-the-cctv-puzzler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lib Dem Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ian tomlinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick hardwick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=13609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a good bit of sleuthing, the Ill and Ancient blog (via Wardman Wire) has put together a photo montage revealing that there are three CCTV cameras in place covering the location where Ian Tomlinson got hit and pushed to the ground by a policeman during the G20 protests. You can see it for yourself [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a good bit of sleuthing, the <a href="http://illandancient.blogspot.com/2009/04/locations-of-cameras-around-cornhill.html">Ill and Ancient blog</a> (via <a href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2009/04/13/ian-tomlinson-ipcc-claimed-no-cctv-cameras-here-then-reversed-their-position/">Wardman Wire</a>) has put together a photo montage revealing that there are three CCTV cameras in place covering the location where Ian Tomlinson got hit and pushed to the ground by a policeman during the G20 protests. You can <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/manc_ill_kid/3435368330/sizes/l/">see it for yourself here</a>.</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Well, it&#8217;s because the police and the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission, who are investigating Ian Tomlinson&#8217;s death) have both said there&#8217;s no CCTV footage of the incident.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/cctv-footage-ian-tomlinson-g20-death-13515.html">previously blogged</a> about the contrast between the earlier very positive police comments about how efficient and detailed their CCTV coverage of the demonstration was and these current comments about there being none of the key incident.</p>
<p>On top of that, it does seem rather a stretch to think that all three of the cameras identified by Ill and Ancient were not working that day (or were pointing in a different direction, but subsequently turned round by the time the photomontage was put together). Certainly as the IPCC news release from 6 April confirms, there were <a href="http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/news/pr060409_tomlinsoninv.htm">other CCTV cameras in the immediate vicinity which were working</a>, which would appear to rule out explanations such as a power cut across the area of a blanket systems failure.</p>
<p>So all a bit rum.</p>
<p>The IPCC themselves haven&#8217;t helped matters by first having their chair Nick Hardwick tell Channel 4 News that there were given CCTV footage by <em>The Guardian</em>. Then when it was pointed out in the interview that <em>The Guardian</em>&#8217;s footage wasn&#8217;t CCTV and the point was pressed, Nick Hardwick said instead that, &#8220;there were no cameras in the location&#8221; (which isn&#8217;t accurate). Finally, the IPCC subsequently told Channel 4 that there were cameras, but they weren&#8217;t working &#8211; a third version of events.</p>
<p>Channel 4 rather generously describes this third version has having &#8220;confirmed&#8221; Nick  Hardwick&#8217;s earlier comments, though if you read the quotes and watch the clip <a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/society/law_order/ipcc%20cctv%20wasnt%20working/3078297">on their website</a> it is clear that there were three different versions run through.</p>
<p>One thing at least is clear from all this: given all these oddities, the IPCC report is going to have to go into a lot of solid detail on the CCTV evidence to have a decent chance of gaining public confidence for its findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markpack.org.uk/1394/ian-tomlinson%e2%80%99s-death-and-the-cctv-puzzler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police change their tune on G20 CCTV coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/1272/police-change-their-tune-on-g20-cctv-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markpack.org.uk/1272/police-change-their-tune-on-g20-cctv-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lib Dem Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ian tomlinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=13515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the death of Ian Tomlinson during the G20 protests, reading this:
Nick Hardwick, chairman of the Independent Police Complaints Commission, gives the first interview about the death of Ian Tomlinson to Krishnan Guru-Murthy.
Hardwick said of the assault:
&#8220;We don&#8217;t have CCTV footage of the incident&#8230; there is no CCTV footage, there were no cameras in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the death of Ian Tomlinson during the G20 protests, <a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/society/law_order/ipcc%20cctv%20wasnt%20working/3078297">reading this</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Nick Hardwick, chairman of the Independent Police Complaints Commission, gives the first interview about the death of Ian Tomlinson to Krishnan Guru-Murthy.</p>
<p>Hardwick said of the assault:</p>
<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t have CCTV footage of the incident&#8230; there is no CCTV footage, there were no cameras in the location where he was assaulted.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking to More 4 News, the IPCC confirmed Hardwick&#8217;s comment, saying that the CCTV cameras overlooking the incident were not working.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>reminds me of how, before the story of the police&#8217;s connect to Ian Tomlinson&#8217;s death came out, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/02/g20-protests-london">the police were talking about how good their CCTV coverage had been</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Commander Simon O&#8217;Brien, of the Met, said small pockets of criminals among the 4,000-strong crowd were to blame for the trouble yesterday&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;There were small groups charging forwards and backwards into police lines. It did seem to us, from CCTV and police on the scene, that they tried to find a way to ramp up the protest and hijack it into violence.&#8221;</p>
<p>O&#8217;Brien said police had collected footage from helitelly, the force&#8217;s nickname for CCTV from powerful helicopter cameras, adding that those identified should expect a &#8220;knock on the door&#8221;.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ah well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markpack.org.uk/1272/police-change-their-tune-on-g20-cctv-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minister tackling offshore tax havens … uses an offshore tax haven himself</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/292/minister-tackling-offshore-tax-havens-%e2%80%a6-uses-an-offshore-tax-haven-himself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markpack.org.uk/292/minister-tackling-offshore-tax-havens-%e2%80%a6-uses-an-offshore-tax-haven-himself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lib Dem Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lord myners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norman baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=12980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Sunday Times reports:
LORD MYNERS, the minister in charge of the government’s assault on tax havens, has used a blind trust to conceal £250,000 of his own money in an offshore shelter.
Details of the secret holding have been obtained by The Sunday Times as G20 leaders gather in London pledging to stamp out tax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5993185.ece">Sunday Times reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>LORD MYNERS, the minister in charge of the government’s assault on tax havens, has used a blind trust to conceal £250,000 of his own money in an offshore shelter.</p>
<p>Details of the secret holding have been obtained by The Sunday Times as G20 leaders gather in London pledging to stamp out tax abuses.</p>
<p>Myners transferred 500,000 of his own shares in the Ermitage hedge fund, based in Jersey, into a blind trust when he became a minister in October &#8230;</p>
<p>He owned the shares while overseeing price-sensitive policy decisions. During this time he met Jersey officials who now say they have “nothing to fear” from any tax haven crackdown &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.normanbaker.org.uk/" class="kblinker" title="More about Norman Baker &raquo;">Norman Baker</a>, the Liberal Democrat MP, said: “Here is a minister calling for greater financial transparency and the end of tax havens while concealing his own tax haven investment. It’s blatant hypocrisy.”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markpack.org.uk/292/minister-tackling-offshore-tax-havens-%e2%80%a6-uses-an-offshore-tax-haven-himself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

