<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Pack &#187; thierry henry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markpack.org.uk/tag/thierry-henry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If I was a football pundit, I&#039;d be telling you how to fix the Thierry Henry fallout at a stroke</title>
		<link>http://www.markpack.org.uk/6805/thierry-henry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markpack.org.uk/6805/thierry-henry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pink Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pink Dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thierry henry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpack.org.uk/?p=6805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s terribly easy. Take one American import &#8211; the coach&#8217;s challenge from American football. Each team&#8217;s manager is allowed to challenge two referee decisions in a match, with a challenge meaning an extra official consults the TV replay footage and then makes a decision (a bit like the fourth umpire in cricket too). The crucial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s terribly easy.</p>
<p>Take one American import &#8211; the coach&#8217;s challenge from American football. Each team&#8217;s manager is allowed to challenge two referee decisions in a match, with a challenge meaning an extra official consults the TV replay footage and then makes a decision (a bit like the fourth umpire in cricket too).</p>
<p>The crucial point is that each manager gets two, and only two, challenges per match. That means you don&#8217;t get a fast flowing game held up all the time for footage consultation. (Hence the need to do something different that simply copy the cricket rules.)</p>
<p>It would also curtail the theatrical over-reactions by players who are appalled at nothingness in an attempt to con the referee. Because what happens if they give a stunning act of protest that doesn&#8217;t sway the referee? Their manager then thinks about using one of their two challenges &#8211; at which point the player would have to either see a challenge wasted or do a nimble bit of acting back tracking and suddenly swear that everything is really all right after all.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be worth doing just to see the histrionic u-turns.</p>
<p>But them, I&#8217;m not a football pundit. So what do I know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markpack.org.uk/6805/thierry-henry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

