Constituency polls vs MRP vs 2017 results: where to look for tactical advice?

So far, we’ve had ten constituency opinion polls released, one full set of MRP data (which is a large scale national poll then used to model the results in individual constituencies) plus of course the 2017 general election results in all seats.

How do they compare? Let’s look at those seats for which we have all three.

In nine out of ten cases, both the constituency poll and the MRP data used agree on which pair of parties is currently in the top two slots (and hence who should be considered as potential recipients of tactical votes). The one exception is Portsmouth South, where MRP and the constituency poll diverge on who is in the top two.

What’s more, six of those nine cases involve a change in the top two from 2017 and so in those cases both MRP and constituency polling agree with each other but point to a different tactical voting choice than the 2017 results would suggest.

Overall then, MRP and constituency polling are painting a broadly similar picture, including in cases where they both show a major change from the 2017 general election result.

That means that, broadly speaking, based on the public data we have so far, either (a) both this MRP data and the constituency polls are wrong, or (b) the 2017 general election result will not be a great guide to tactical voting decisions.

My money is on (b) as that both would fit with what we know from other data (e.g. the big swings shown in the national polls and the pattern of vote shares in the European elections, both of which suggest significant limitations to using the 2017 results as tactical voting guides), and also as the constituency polls and MRP get to their answers via very different routes. Two different approaches coming up with roughly the same answer gives that answer extra weight.

Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 16% 52% 29% 2%
Poll (October) 10% 30% 39% 7% 12%
MRP 16% 30% 38% 6% 7%
Esher and Walton
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 59% 19% 17% (2% Ukip) 2%
Poll (October) 45% 11% 36% 4% 3%
MRP 38% 9% 35% 11% 5%
Finchley and Golders Green
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 47% 44% 7% (1% Ukip) 2%
Poll (October) 29% 25% 41% 2% 3%
MRP 36% 25% 26% 5% 5%
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 43% 52% 2% (2% Ukip) 1%
Poll (November) 37% 42% 6% 13% 1%
MRP 36% 29% 16% 11% 5%
North East Somerset
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 54% 35% 8% 2%
Poll (October) 44% 14% 28% 7% 3%
MRP 41% 18% 23% 8% 7%
Portsmouth South
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 38% 41% 17% (3% Ukip)
Poll (October) 27% 24% 30% 14%
MRP 30% 25% 22% 12% 10%
South Cambridgeshire
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 52% 27% 19% 2%
Poll (November) 36% 12% 40% 7% 4%
MRP 38% 14% 31% 7% 8%
South East Cambridgeshire
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 53% 28% 19%
Poll (October) 42% 16% 31% 8%
MRP 37% 16% 29% 10% 6%
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 57% 25% 16% 2%
Poll (November) 42% 12% 38% ? ?
MRP 40% 13% 29% 8% 7%
Con Lab Lib Dem Brexit Green
2017 result 42% 51% 7% (4% Ukip)
Poll (October) 45% 34% 5% 13% 2%
MRP 33% 31% 12% 18% 4%

Get polling news and analysis by email

Sign up here if you would like to receive the Polling UnPacked occasional email newsletter, highlighting the best in analysis and news about British political opinion polling from a carefully curated range of high-quality sites (no more than one email a day and usually much less frequent):

  • If you submit this form, your data will be used in line with the privacy policy here to update you on the topic(s) selected. This may including using this data to contact you via a variety of digital channels.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

4 responses to “Constituency polls vs MRP vs 2017 results: where to look for tactical advice?”

  1. Is it possible to use a more complex mathematical model that factors in both national change from 2017 to 2019 (ge Lib Dems polling at 2-3 times what they were) and local factors such as how pro-Remain a constituency was ?

    Also what is your take on the Labour complaint about using the extrapolation from the ‘Flavible’ website set up by the two data scientists, and them not being a member of the British Polling Council ? Presumably, since they use data that is already acquired, they are not pollsters ?

    • Apologies ! On reading a bit further – looks like that is what MRP is – although it is not clear what they built in to the constituency estimates.

      And it looks like what Flavible did is pretty much what I described.

  2. We have only to consider how good a guide the 2010 results were to what would happen in 2015! This time, given the huge concentration on one UK-wide issue, the results are quite likely to bear even less resemblance to the previous general election.

  3. Really glad someone converted the graphs from Best for Britain; I’d bulk downloaded them all in preparing for a script to analyse the images, but this link has saved me a job I probably wouldn’t have got round to!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments and data you submit with them will be handled in line with the privacy and moderation policies.