The difficulties of debunking vaccine junk science

Over on Vox, there’s an excellent piece about the difficulties of rebutting anti-vaccine scares:

I called Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth who specializes in the sometimes magical thinking people have in politics and health care. In a study on perceptions of flu shots, he found correcting myths had the opposite of the desired effect on the most vaccine-skeptical among us. In another study on the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine, he found that myth-busting actually increased some parents’ wariness about the shot. In his political research, he has demonstrated that giving people corrective information can deepen their misperceptions — findings that dishearten any debunker.

The full piece is well worth a read, especially for the implications for political campaigning – simply assuming that you can win over doubters with rational arguments often makes matters worse (emotions need to be appealed to too, and sometimes you have to admit that a particular topic is not a good one to argue over), and also the importance of using trusted, independent voices.


There is one comment

Share your views

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments and data you submit with them will be handled in line with the privacy and moderation policies.