Political

Bedford: it was a caucus, not a primary

The Conservative selection of their Mayor candidate in Bedford was, on any sensible meaning of the words, a caucus, not a primary. A caucus requires people to turn up to a meeting and sit there for a while before casting a vote. A primary simply requires people to vote.

They’ve both got their pros and cons – most simply, a primary gets more people involved, a caucus requires more commitment from those who get involved. But it’s just a route to confusion to start calling caucuses primaries. (Even if you’re tempted because primary = Exciting! Modern! Good! and caucus = Smoke-filled rooms! Cliques! Bad!)

That’s all.

The post was brought to you by the Union of Doomed To Be Disappointed Political Pedants.

0 responses to “Bedford: it was a caucus, not a primary”

  1. I was under the impression that a caucaus was not just about turning up at a meeting, it aslo involves publically declaring your voting interntion by voting with your feet, which for many reasons, is different from a secret ballot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments and data you submit with them will be handled in line with the privacy and moderation policies.