Bedford: it was a caucus, not a primary

16 September 2009 + 0

The Conservative selection of their Mayor candidate in Bedford was, on any sensible meaning of the words, a caucus, not a primary. A caucus requires people to turn up to a meeting and sit there for a while before casting a vote. A primary simply requires people to vote.

They’ve both got their pros and cons – most simply, a primary gets more people involved, a caucus requires more commitment from those who get involved. But it’s just a route to confusion to start calling caucuses primaries. (Even if you’re tempted because primary = Exciting! Modern! Good! and caucus = Smoke-filled rooms! Cliques! Bad!)

That’s all.

The post was brought to you by the Union of Doomed To Be Disappointed Political Pedants.

You might also be interested in...

Comment via Facebook

Comments and references (0)

  1. George Turner says:

    I was under the impression that a caucaus was not just about turning up at a meeting, it aslo involves publically declaring your voting interntion by voting with your feet, which for many reasons, is different from a secret ballot.

C-