Voters given wrong information in marginal Peterborough ward

One more electoral administration story from this year’s local elections, following the problems with ballot paper errors and people being asked to vote for the wrong ward. This one is from Peterborough where some voters were told they had one vote rather than two:

Two seats were up for grabs in Fletton and Woodston in the Peterborough City Council elections, which were taken by Andy Coles (Conservative) with 997 votes and Imtiaz Ali (Labour and Co-operative Party) with 933.

However in one polling station 87 voters were told only to choose one candidate rather than two – and with runners-up Lisa Forbes and Andrew Willey eventually finishing just behind on 911 and 900 votes respectively the extra votes could have proved crucial…

A city council spokeswoman said: “An issue was reported to us on the morning of polling day by the presiding officer of a polling station in Fletton & Woodston ward.

“The presiding officer in question is very experienced in the role but made a genuine mistake in advising a number of people to vote for only one candidate in the election to appoint two councillors for the Fletton & Woodston ward.

“Each voter should have been advised to vote for two candidates as there are two seats up for election. Directions in the polling booths and on the ballot papers did make it clear how many candidates to vote for.” [Peterborough Matters]

Keep up with news about elections by email

If you’d like to be notified by email when new posts about how are how our elections are run appear on this blog, just sign up here. (Note: if you’re already signed up for a daily email alert with all my new blog posts, then there’s no need to sign up for these alerts too as the stories will also be in the full daily digest.)

  • If you submit this form, your data will be used in line with the privacy policy here to update you on the topic(s) selected. This may including using this data to contact you via a variety of digital channels.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments and data you submit with them will be handled in line with the privacy and moderation policies.